Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Children and adolescents with hearing loss frequently encounter reduced auditory access and delayed language development, factors that may influence the maturation of executive functions. This study examined developmental differences in planning, a core executive function, in 98 children and adolescents with hearing loss or normal hearing aged 7 to18 years using the Tower of London task. Compared to normal hearing peers, participants with hearing loss made more unnecessary moves and rule violations and initiated problem-solving more rapidly, suggesting reduced preplanning efficiency and increased impulsivity. These group differences were most pronounced in adolescents, who showed faster initiation and greater movement inefficiency than age-matched normal hearing participants. Within the hearing loss group, adolescents displayed higher accuracy and longer initiation times than children, reflecting developmental improvements despite persistent gaps relative to hearing peers. Language development age did not alter the main effects. Findings indicate that reduced early auditory and language access may contribute to differences in planning development, highlighting the need for targeted executive functions support in educational and clinical settings for youth with hearing loss.

Background: Adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) are a key safety concern during deprescribing but remain poorly explored in pharmacovigilance systems. Objectives: To identify and compare ADWE signals across drug classes, different drugs within drug classes, and across patient characteristics, countries, and over time. Methods: A case/non-case disproportionality analysis was conducted in FDA-FAERS and EMA-EudraVigilance pharmacovigilance databases, with stratification by age (adults: 18-64, older adults: [≥]65), sex (male/female), reporting time (2004-2023 in 5-year intervals), and country (for EMA data). Disproportionality analysis (quantitative signal detection) was used to detect signals between ADWEs and drugs using the proportional reporting rate (PRR[≥]2), reporting odds ratio (ROR>1), and information component (IC>0) with case count [≥]5. Results: Overall, 158,501 reports (FDA-FAERS 145,514; EMA-EudraVigilance 12,987) included drug-event pairs related to ADWEs. In FDA-FAERS, clobetasone (IC=5.58; PRR=79.18; ROR=176.90) showed the strongest ADWE signals, followed by hydromorphone (4.85; 29.94; 37.37), hydrocodone, and paroxetine. In EMA-EudraVigilance, ethyl loflazepate (IC=6.01; PRR=119.80; ROR=197.53), clobetasone (5.39; 102.73; 155.10), veralipride, and levomethadone had the strongest signals. Most drugs maintained positive ADWE signals in analysis stratified into adults and older adults. However, among the top 10 drugs (based on highest IC values), buprenorphine/naloxone, desvenlafaxine, and baclofen in FDA-FAERS (ICs 4.95-6.05) showed stronger signals in older adults. A sex-based difference was observed, with paroxetine, venlafaxine, and buprenorphine/naloxone showing a stronger positive signal in females in both databases, whereas several opioids had stronger signals in males versus females across both databases. Conclusion: This study suggests ADWE signals for some medications differ by age and sex, potentially indicating different risks for withdrawal effects.

Abstract: Objective: Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a common sequela of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Research indicates that individuals with PTE tend to experience greater cognitive difficulties compared to those with TBI alone. However, it is plausible that a distinct cognitive profile exists that distinguishes between TBI cases with and without PTE. We aimed to identify longitudinal changes in cognitive measures among TBI patients to better assess the changes associated with developing PTE. Setting: Outpatient. Participants: Prospective subjects who had suffered TBI within 6 months post-injury (TBI-6M, n=32), retrospective subjects with pre-existing PTE diagnoses (PTE, n=20), and healthy control subjects (HC, n=41). Design: We examined cognitive performance for TBI patients within 6 months post-injury, then again within 12 months (TBI-12M, n=26), and within 18-months (TBI-18M, n=25), and compared this with cognitive performance among HC and PTE. Main Measures: Cognitive tests administered yielded 15 test components for analysis. We utilized linear mixed effects modeling to examine cohort-level differences cognitive function. Results: 11/15 tests showed a significant performance deficit in the PTE subjects compared to HC. TBI-6M was not significantly different from the PTE subjects; with time, 9/15 tests showed some degree of recovery in TBI subjects. Tests for information processing speed/working memory and executive function showed strong recovery (TBI-6M vs. TBI-18M, SDMT written: p<0.0001, SDMT oral and COWAT: p<0.001). Tests for visual attention/working memory also showed a smaller but significant recovery (TBI-18M vs. PTE, p<0.05). By contrast, tests for verbal memory [HVLT-R Delayed Recall] showed chronic impairment in TBI (TBI-18M vs HC, p<0.0001). TBI subjects generally trend towards recovery in cognitive performance post-TBI. Conclusions: Information processing speed/working memory are strong indicators for TBI recovery, while auditory learning/memory shows chronic impairment. The stagnation of recovery in cognitive domains typically characterized by robust recovery may correlate with an elevated risk of developing PTE.

The availability of hearing aids that can connect wirelessly to smartphone technologies via Bluetooth has grown exponentially in recent years. However, there is limited evidence assessing the benefits of user-adjustability afforded by these devices. This study aimed to assess the benefits of smartphone-connected hearing aids and an accompanying application (or app) in new and existing hearing aid users. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 44 adult hearing aid users (14 new and 30 existing) were recruited. Participants were fitted bilaterally with smartphone-connected hearing aids that could be adjusted by the user via an app. Self-reported outcome measures were collected at fitting and after seven-weeks of using the device in everyday life. For both new and existing hearing aid users, significant improvements in social participation, hearing-related fatigue, and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction were found. For existing hearing aid users, all outcomes were significantly better for the smartphone-connected hearing aids plus app in comparison to their existing hearing aids that did not connect to a smartphone, all with moderate-to-large clinical effect sizes (d> .6). User-controllability via the app was identified as the key benefit, and most participants (68%) reported that the app met their needs 'extremely' or 'very well'. These results suggest that, when used in conjunction with an app, smartphone-connected hearing aids can improve hearing outcomes due to greater user-controllability to improve listening. Thus, smartphone-connected hearing aids have the potential to facilitate patient-centred care, empowering the individual to successfully manage their hearing loss.

The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ-50) is widely used to assess autistic traits, yet its Hungarian version has not been psychometrically evaluated. We assessed the reliability, factor structure, temporal stability, convergent validity, and clinical utility of the Hungarian AQ-50 and a revised translation (AQ-50-HU-R) in two samples (N1 = 1967; N2 = 423), including autistic and non-autistic participants. The AQ-50-HU-R showed high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. A bifactor model provided the best fit ({chi}2[1125] = 1650.433, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.991; TLI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.033 [90% CI = 0.030-0.037]; SRMR = 0.083), with 71% of common variance attributable to a general autistic traits factor. The total score distinguished clinically verified autistic participants from participants reporting no ASD diagnosis (AUC = 0.906), with a cutoff of 25. Associations with ADOS scores were weak or nonsignificant. The AQ-50-HU-R is best interpreted as a reliable total-score screening measure, supporting referral for comprehensive autism assessment.

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition defined by differences in social communication and restricted, repetitive behaviours. As diagnostic criteria have broadened, ASD is now recognised across a wider range of individuals, raising key questions about its structure: does ASD have discrete sub-types, or is it better conceptualised as a continuous, possibly multidimensional, condition? We aim to explore whether a multidimensional continuum model more accurately captures the variability within ASD. We analysed a large SPARK phenotypic dataset of medical history and diagnostic surveys (background history, SCQ, RBS-R; n=36,710 individuals). We apply and compare two traditional statistical approaches, Factor Analysis and Gaussian Mixture Models, with a modern machine learning technique, the Variational Autoencoder (VAE). VAEs reconstructed unseen test data with ~4-fold better accuracy than Factor Analysis, and ~8-fold better accuracy than Gaussian Mixture Models. We identified four stable latent factors across 100 independently trained VAEs. These four dimensions provide an individual behavioural profile that can be visualized using radar-plots, offering a compact way to compare profiles at the person level. Through further analysis, we found evidence for 3 overlapping clusters or subtypes of ASD identified within the 4D latent space. This work aims to inform new ways of modelling ASD using a VAE that will be able to discern between a continuum or a clustered output and that go beyond binary diagnosis, instead reflecting the complex range of trait profiles, with implications for personalised diagnosis and intervention.

Generalization is a key cognitive process that allows humans to flexibly apply prior knowledge to guide new behaviors. Difficulties with generalization and flexibility are observed across neurodevelopmental disorders, especially autism, limiting adaptive function and quality of life. Cognitive-behavioral treatment benefits some but not all autistic individuals. As treatment requires application of learned skills to everyday life, variability in generalization ability may limit intervention success in autism. While cognitive substrates of learning and generalization are well established, their potential for explaining clinical outcomes is not known. Here, we combined a category learning task with computational modelling to distinguish two learning strategies underlying generalization -- prototype abstraction vs. exemplar memorization -- and tested whether individual differences in these learning strategies predicted real-world intervention outcomes in autistic youth. Fifty-four participants completed the category learning task at two pre-intervention timepoints, and then completed Unstuck and On Target:14-22 intervention targeting flexible problem solving, goal setting, and planning. We found that participants who consistently relied on prototype abstraction (N=26) were subsequently more likely to benefit from the intervention, showing improvement in parent- and self-reported flexibility. These findings identify prototype abstraction as a clinically relevant cognitive capacity that may help explain individual differences in intervention response and support the tailoring of interventions. More broadly, they demonstrate the value of linking basic cognitive mechanisms to clinical outcomes and may inform strategies to enhance the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral interventions for youth with developmental disabilities.

Purpose: In clinical trials, treatment efficacy is commonly assessed by comparing control and treatment groups. However, in large samples, even small and clinically trivial differences may achieve statistical significance. Accordingly, the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is used as a threshold to determine whether statistically-significant effects are also clinically meaningful to patients. The objective of this study was to estimate the MCID for the Childhood Autism Rating Scale Second-Edition (CARS2) using the Patient Impression of Change (PIC) as an external anchor. Methods: Single-item PICs are not well suited to characterizing improvement in a multifaceted disorder such as ASD. Accordingly, the 77-item Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) was used as a multi-item PIC. CARS2 and ATEC were administered concurrently to 62 children with ASD, aged 1.8-7.9 years, with assessments conducted six months apart. Results: The correlation between changes in CARS2 and ATEC total scores was 0.41-0.44 (p<0.0001), supporting the use of ATEC as an anchor measure. Two anchor-based methods yielded MCIDs of 2.39-2.82 CARS2 points. Two distribution-based methods produced MCIDs of 1.33-3.32. Conclusions: Taken together, these approaches suggest that a between-group difference of 2.6 CARS2 points (the midpoint of the anchor-based estimates) may serve as the MCID in children with ASD.

Objective: Published P300-speller fusion schemes fix prior trust regardless of trial reliability; we tested whether a reliability estimate improves on it. Methods: We reanalyzed 3,373 archived P300-speller selections from 47 people with ALS (BigP3BCI). A fair, matched-search-space comparison, tuning both a fixed weight and an adaptive policy out-of-fold, was evaluated across 22 evaluable language-model priors up to 46.7B parameters. Two representative priors, GPT-2 and a classical 5-gram, additionally received detailed naive and mechanistic analyses. Results: No prior's 95% CI favored adaptive fusion under the fair comparison, despite unexploited oracle headroom at every scale. Under GPT-2, the naive comparison was significantly worse for adaptive fusion; both anchors converged to a degenerate or near-degenerate fair-comparison solution. For the representative anchors, three further controllers failed to convert that headroom into benefit; the fixed-fused posterior's output probability outperformed the best controller for flagging errors (2.8- to 3.8-fold enrichment). Conclusion: A tuned fixed weight is a difficult-to-beat default across the tested scale range; reliability estimation gave no deployable adaptive advantage. Significance: Adaptive weighting should be validated against a fairly tuned baseline across model families and scales; in this dataset, the fused output's confidence identified high-risk selections better than the tested purpose-built ranker.

Objectives: Dentists prescribe approximately one in ten antibiotics worldwide, yet antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) remains underemphasized in dental education. Large language models (LLMs) may support AMS training, but their proficiency and clinical reasoning in this context remain unclear. We evaluated GPT-4o's accuracy and clinical reasoning on dental antibiotic prescribing questions, stratified by question difficulty. Methods: We assembled 125 multiple-choice questions on dental antibiotic prescribing from eight peer-reviewed studies (2017-2023). GPT-4o answered each question and generated a clinical justification. Accuracy was assessed against source-study answer keys and examined across difficulty quartiles. Justifications were evaluated using an adapted 12-axis human-evaluation framework assessing scientific consensus, extent and likelihood of harm, inappropriate and missing content, bias, and both correct and incorrect comprehension, retrieval, and reasoning. Prophylaxis-specific questions were analysed separately. Results: GPT-4o correctly answered 72% of questions. Accuracy remained relatively stable across difficulty quartiles (78%, 78%, 65%, 70%). Experts rated 95.4% of justifications positively across the 12 axes. Comprehension, retrieval, and reasoning each exceeded 96.2% positive ratings. Missing content was the main weakness (7.8%), and 7.1% of justifications showed a moderate-to-severe potential for harm. Performance on prophylaxis-specific questions (98.1%) exceeded non-prophylaxis questions (93.0%). Conclusions: GPT-4o demonstrated moderate-to-high proficiency and clinically defensible reasoning in dental antibiotic prescribing questions. However, residual risks indicate that it is not suitable for unsupervised clinical use but shows potential as a supervised AMS educational tool.

Large language models perform well on medical examinations, but users routinely challenge their answers and invoke professional roles, and it is unclear what a system does when a medical credential and a stated task-specific accuracy point in opposite directions. In a factorial experiment on 480 items from four Polish specialty examination sets and three consumer large language model systems (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini), each item and system received eleven independent conversations. Conditions crossed attributed source role (medical student, experienced specialist), stated prior accuracy on similar questions (2/10, 8/10) and suggestion correctness. The primary outcome was adoption of a prespecified incorrect option when the baseline answer matched the official key, comparing a specialist described as 2/10 with a student described as 8/10. Baseline agreement with the key was 87.2% across 15,683 analyzable conversations. The incorrect option was adopted more often from the specialist described as 2/10 than from the student described as 8/10 (10.2% vs. 7.6%; adjusted risk difference +2.82 percentage points, 95% CI +0.65 to +4.99). Estimates varied across the three systems and only one system-specific interval excluded zero. In a prespecified exploratory analysis with a shared eligibility rule, correct suggestions were adopted far more often than incorrect ones (risk difference +35.7 percentage points, 95% CI +30.8 to +40.7), indicating selective rather than indiscriminate compliance. An incorrect suggestion from a specialist with low stated accuracy was therefore slightly more influential than the same suggestion from a student with high stated accuracy, although the difference was modest and varied across systems. Agreement reached only after a user has disclosed a preferred answer should not automatically be treated as an independent second opinion, and medical large language model systems should be evaluated on how they revise answers after such disclosure, not solely on initial accuracy.

The inflammatory foreign body response that follows cochlear implantation produces intracochlear fibrosis, neo-ossification, and elevated electrode impedances that can compromise implant performance. Dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implants reduce this response, but the durability of their anti-inflammatory effect over long implantation intervals has not been established. Using a murine model of chronic cochlear implantation in CX3CR1+/eGFP Thy1+/eYFP dual-reporter mice, we compared dexamethasone-eluting and standard mouse cochlear implants at 224 and 336 days post-implantation. Density of CX3CR1+ macrophages, MHCII+CX3CR1+ antigen-presenting macrophages, -SMA+ fibrosis, and neo-ossification were quantified in the scala tympani, Rosenthal canal, and lateral wall of the basal turn. Standard implants produced persistent macrophage and antigen-presenting macrophage infiltration, accompanied by an -SMA+ fibrotic response and neo-ossification. Dexamethasone-eluting implants suppressed macrophage infiltration in all three regions out to 336 days and reduced fibrosis at 224 days. In the subset of cochleae with electrode array translocation, dexamethasone-eluting implants attenuated macrophage infiltration and confined the fibrotic and osseous response to the site of translocation, whereas standard implants produced a widespread response. A reduction in immune cell density was also observed in the contralateral, unimplanted cochleae of animals implanted with dexamethasone-eluting implants, suggesting a wider component to the drug's effect. Dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implants therefore provide sustained, long-term suppression of the cochlear foreign body response in mice, supporting their continued translation toward clinical application. This effect was associated with continued low-level dexamethasone elution out to 336 days post-implantation; further work is needed to assess the durability of this effect at the conclusion of drug elution.

Background: As cannabis policy changes in the United States, secondhand cannabis smoke (SCS) is increasingly common, including within families. However, prevalence of exposure and clinical correlates over time in adolescents are not fully understood. Objectives: (1) To estimate the prevalence of SCS and personal cannabis use in US-based teens exposed to SCS, and (2) examine the cognitive trajectories of adolescents exposed to SCS compared to non-exposed peers. Methods: Data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study was used. Participants (n=11,316 of full cohort with follow-up data; n=776 with self-reported family SCS exposure) attended yearly visits from ages 11-17, completing substance use interviews, toxicological testing, and the NIH Toolbox Cognitive battery. Youth with SCS but no personal cannabis use (n=419; 47% female) were matched on prenatal substance exposure, family substance use history, and sociodemographics to non-SCS exposed and non-cannabis-using youth with a 1:2 ratio (Controls n=838). Linear mixed-effects models assessed cognitive performance by SCS*age interactions, accounting for random effects of subject and family. Covariates included sex and alcohol, nicotine, and other substance use. Secondary models analyzed performance by cumulative waves of reported SCS exposure interacting with age. Results: Of the full cohort, 6.9% (n=776) reported exposure to SCS. Of these individuals, 46% endorsed lifetime personal cannabis use by age 17, relative to 20% of non-SCS exposed youth (OR=3.83[95%CI:3.29,4.44]). Within matched participants, SCS*age demonstrated a significant interaction on attention and inhibitory control ({beta}=-0.32, p=.028), with SCS demonstrating reduced improvement over time. More waves of exposure were also associated with worse performance over time ({beta}=-0.39, p=.057). Discussion: Almost half of those who had been exposed to SCS endorsed personal cannabis use. Cognitive findings were domain specific, similar to findings in secondhand tobacco: SCS exposed youth showed restricted improvement in attention and inhibitory control by age 17. Public health and policymakers should make efforts to curb youth SCS exposure, given the potential for risk which has not been fully explored to date.

Background: Stress research in nursing education has largely focused on distress, stressors, and negative outcomes, although challenging experiences may also support motivation, confidence, learning, and growth when appraised positively. Objective: To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Nursing Student Positive Stress Scale (NSPSS). Design: A methodological instrument development and psychometric evaluation study. Methods: The NSPSS was developed using a deductive, theory-driven approach informed by the transactional theory of stress and coping and positive psychology perspectives. Content validity was assessed by an international nursing expert panel. Psychometric evaluation used national survey data from nursing students in New Zealand. Of 539 responses, 507 were analysed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted using separate subsamples. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and convergent validity through correlation with Perceived Stress Scale-10 scores. Results: Content validity was strong (I-CVI = .88-1.00; S-CVI/Ave = .975; S-CVI/UA = .800). EFA identified a dominant factor explaining 41.38% of variance (loadings = .528-.735). CFA supported a two-context Academic and Clinical Positive Stress model with correlated residuals between five parallel item pairs, chi-square(29) = 60.49, CFI = .970, TLI = .954, RMSEA = .063, SRMR = .065. Internal consistency was good (alpha = .839; omega = .843). NSPSS scores correlated negatively with PSS-10 scores (r = -.298, p < .001). Conclusion: The NSPSS demonstrated strong content validity, preliminary evidence of structural and convergent validity, and good internal consistency reliability for assessing positive stress appraisal among nursing students. Further validation in independent samples is warranted.

Background & Aims: Fatigue is a central symptom of chronic liver disease (CLD), substantially impacting health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to further understand CLD symptomatology, including fatigue, and its impact on HRQoL from a patient perspective. Methods: Abbott Global Assessment of Patients unmet needs (aGAP) was a multinational, cross-sectional survey in adults with compensated CLD in China, India and Mexico, conducted between July and November 2024. Adult participants who self-reported that they had physician-diagnosed CLD and were experiencing fatigue completed a quantitative survey to assess symptom burden and included three HRQoL patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]-29+2, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Specific Health Problem version 2.0 [WPAI: SHP], Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory [MFI]). Results: Overall, 505 participants (China: 200; Mexico: 105; India: 200) completed the study. Participants reported that their CLD-related fatigue sometimes, often or always affected their self-esteem/confidence (45.1%) and ability to maintain or acquire new employment (38.6%). Most participants reported moderate (51.3%) or serious (26.9%) fatigue, with 33.5% experiencing fatigue every day or almost every day. Many participants felt their social life was negatively impacted by their fatigue (47.3%) and that there were related financial difficulties (53.9%). Use of validated PRO tools demonstrated severe fatigue (MFI: overall mean [SD] 13.9 [3.4] general fatigue and 13.4 [3.6] physical fatigue) as well as substantial levels of work and activity impairment (WPAI: SHP overall mean [SD] 53.0 [26.4]) and high levels of anxiety, pain interference, depression and sleep interference (PROMIS T-scores [&ge;]54). Conclusions: Fatigue has a substantial impact on HRQoL among adults with CLD across several countries, highlighting a global unmet need for targeted interventions to effectively identify and manage the condition.

Artificial intelligence applied to routine electrocardiograms (ECGs) has largely focused on detecting existing disease or predicting individual cardiovascular outcomes. Whether ECGs can support prediction of multiple future diseases across organ systems remains unclear. We developed ECG-RISK, a multitask survival model for 67 incident three-character ICD-10 endpoints using ECG waveforms, demographic characteristics and routinely collected laboratory data from 86,673 MIMIC-IV patients. Discrimination was highest for heart, brain, kidney and lung endpoints, with organ-level C-indices ranging from 0.796 to 0.825, whereas liver and pancreatic endpoints showed lower discrimination. The ECG-only model achieved strong discrimination across most endpoints, whereas the incremental improvement gained by incorporating ECG and laboratory inputs beyond demographic information varied substantially across endpoints. Across the nine exploratory aggregated outcomes, Kaplan Meier curves showed clear separation among model-score tertiles. Discrimination was highest for dementia (C-index, 0.891) and heart failure (C-index, 0.857). These findings support the feasibility of ECG-based longitudinal risk prediction across multiple diseases. External validation and competing-risk analyses are required to assess generalisability and clinical utility.

Objectives To evaluate whether access to a certified large language model (LLM)-based clinical decision support system improves physician diagnostic performance in rheumatology compared with conventional diagnostic resources alone. Methods In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, 82 physicians from seven hospitals in two countries were randomised 1:1 to conventional diagnostic resources plus Prof. Valmed or conventional resources alone. Participants assessed three rheumatology vignettes before and after assistance. The primary outcome was top-1 diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes included top-3 accuracy, diagnostic reasoning, confidence, case-processing time and perceived support quality. Results Top-1 accuracy increased from 22.2% to 33.3% in the intervention group and from 23.3% to 35.0% in the control group, with no between-group difference in improvement (adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.19; p=0.979). Differences in top-3 accuracy, diagnostic reasoning and confidence were also not significant. Assisted case-processing time was substantially shorter with LLM support (94 vs 206 s; adjusted mean difference -112 s, 95% CI -141 to -83; p<0.001). Information timeliness and perceived diagnostic support quality were rated significantly higher in the intervention group. Exploratory analyses showed persistent overconfidence and substantial AI over-reliance. Conclusions Certified LLM-based diagnostic support did not improve diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional resources, but substantially reduced case-processing time and improved perceived support quality. These findings suggest potential workflow benefits while highlighting overconfidence and over-reliance as important safety considerations.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, procedural performance, sample recovery, and surgeon preference of an ophthalmic needle designed specifically for anterior chamber (AC) paracentesis. Methods: In this multicenter study, AC paracentesis was performed in clinic and operating-room settings using a 32-gauge x 4-mm needle with low dead space. The procedure was evaluated using a standardized physician survey. Prespecified outcomes included procedure-related adverse events (primary outcome), needle entry and handling, aspiration and sample recovery, comparative performance versus a 30-gauge needle, and physician preference for future use. Results: A total of 110 needle uses by eight surgeons were included. No ocular complications occurred, including lens or iris injury, hyphema, AC collapse, wound leak, hypotony, infection, or retinal complication, and no procedure required needle exchange or conversion to another device. Two technical events without ocular sequelae were noted, in which needle entry was partial thickness and did not reach the AC (1.8%; exact 95% CI, 0.2%-6.4%). Physicians rated needle entry, handling and sample recovery as good or excellent. Compared with a 30-gauge needle, the study needle was rated as at least comparable across all assessed domains. All surgeons rated it better or much better for intra-procedural safety and preferred it for future AC taps. Conclusions and Relevance: This short, 32-gauge low-dead-space ophthalmic needle demonstrated a favorable safety profile and was preferred over a 30-gauge needle by all surgeons. As aqueous humor liquid biopsy expands in clinical diagnostics and trials, an ophthalmic-specific needle design may help improve the consistency and safety of aqueous humor collection for molecular analysis and broader clinical use. Keywords: Anterior chamber paracentesis; Aqueous humor; Liquid biopsy; Low dead space; Ophthalmic needle

Background: Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients are prone to HLA-antibody formation from multiple surgeries, transfusions, and prosthetic surgical material. Females with ACHD may accrue additional, non-surgical alloantigen exposure. Whether sex modifies the impact of allosensitization on heart transplant (HT) access and outcomes in ACHD remains unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the OPTN/UNOS registry of adults with ACHD listed for first-time HT (2018-2025). Sensitization was defined by calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) at listing. We tested the sex x sensitization (highly sensitized, cPRA >50%) interaction on transplant access using Fine-Gray competing-risks regression, treating transplantation as the event of interest and death or removal from the waitlist as competing events, and on post-transplant survival using multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression, both adjusted for age at listing, mechanical support at listing, and the number of distinct prior cardiac surgery categories. Results: Among 856 candidates (38% female), females were more often highly sensitized than males (23% vs 14%; age-adjusted OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.26-2.61), even after adjusting for surgical burden. Sensitization reduced transplant access in females (84% to 71%; median wait 60 to 110 days, p < 0.001) but not males (79% vs 79%, median wait 88 vs 98 days). In adjusted Fine-Gray models, the subdistribution hazard for transplant was reduced in sensitized females (sHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.72) with no effect in males (sHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73-1.26), and the sex x sensitization interaction was significant (interaction sHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Post-transplant mortality was numerically higher in sensitized than non-sensitized candidates in both sexes and the sex x sensitization interaction on 1-year mortality was not significant. The sex-asymmetric effect persisted and was more pronounced in the multiorgan candidates. Conclusions: Allosensitization is not a sex-neutral barrier to transplant in HT candidates with ACHD. Females are more sensitized and have reduced transplant access without differences in 1-year mortality. The female excess in sensitization is not accounted for by surgical burden, and the exposures responsible remain to be defined. These findings warrant a sex-aware listing strategy and further studies.

Introduction: Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS), formerly known as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), is a common endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age. Besides reproductive and metabolic disturbances, PMOS negatively impacts psychological well-being and quality of life. Despite available treatment options, there remains a need for safe and effective therapies that improve both clinical symptoms and fertility outcomes. Aim: To compare the efficacy of VAMHA and MYRHA tablet combination therapy with standard non-hormonal therapy in restoring regular menstruation. Secondary objectives included assessment of ovulation, menstrual symptoms, polycystic ovarian morphology, hormonal and metabolic parameters, anthropometric measures, and skin manifestations. Study Design: Open-label, randomized, multicentre, prospective comparative clinical study. Methods: Seventy-one women with PMOS were randomized to Group A (n=37) or Group B (n=34). Group A received VAMHA and MYRHA tablets (2 tablets each), while Group B received Metformin 500 mg plus Myoinositol 600 mg (1 tablet), twice daily for 180 days. Data were recorded in Case Report Forms. Statistical Analysis: Continuous variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Appropriate statistical tests, including Chi-square, were used. A p-value [&le;]0.05 was considered significant. Results: Significantly more participants in Group A achieved regular menstrual cycles than Group B (31 vs. 22; p<0.05). Ovulation occurred in 16 participants in Group A compared with 6 in Group B (p<0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in menstrual irregularity and related symptoms. Significant reductions in Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), fasting insulin, and body mass index (BMI) were observed in both groups (p<0.05). Resolution of polycystic ovarian morphology occurred in 13 participants (38.23%) in Group A and 10 (33.33%) in Group B. Both treatments were well tolerated with no major safety concerns. Conclusions: VAMHA and MYRHA combination therapy was superior to standard non-hormonal therapy in improving menstrual regularity and ovulation. It also produced favourable metabolic, hormonal, and ultrasonographic outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and effective option for comprehensive PMOS management and fertility enhancement.